| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
swaldo
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 780
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:05 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Why should it be Taylor that is the one who has to suffer when she was the one betrayed. We also know why this story was re-written, for Bricky, which never took place. Why shouldn't Taylor have her son back.
If you're going to say it's because it was shown she didn't bond (she did) or that she shows no interest, than let me remind some of you that Brooke lost custody of Hope & RJ, she DID NOT get custody back through the courts, but because Ridge decided Brooke NEEDED her kids (not that they needed her), so he gave them back to her.
As for Bridget, I hope she makes sure it's HER egg being used otherwise Nick could do the same thing to her - take "his child" away from her because it's not her DNA. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MYBeauty
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 207
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How is Taylor suffering?? She looks fine to me. She isn't pining for Jack, and she doesn't seem to have a problem with the arrangement, so how is she suffering? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Misses M
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 1921
Location: Hunter/Taylor fan
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MYBeauty wrote: | | How is Taylor suffering?? She looks fine to me. She isn't pining for Jack, and she doesn't seem to have a problem with the arrangement, so how is she suffering? |
Because it is not shown on screen does not mean that she does not suffer in privates, Taylor is a person who most of the times suffers in private.
And at this point Taylor is not written to have any dialog, but that can change. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MYBeauty
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 207
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Misses M wrote: | | MYBeauty wrote: | | How is Taylor suffering?? She looks fine to me. She isn't pining for Jack, and she doesn't seem to have a problem with the arrangement, so how is she suffering? |
Because it is not shown on screen does not mean that she does not suffer in privates, Taylor is a person who most of the times suffers in private.
And at this point Taylor is not written to have any dialog, but that can change. |
MIsses M. when they actually show Taylor suffering, or if they insinuate she is doing it off stage, then I will agree with you. But, she isn't suffering that we can see. Why do we have to assume she is? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Misses M
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 1921
Location: Hunter/Taylor fan
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MYBeauty wrote: | | Misses M wrote: | | MYBeauty wrote: | | How is Taylor suffering?? She looks fine to me. She isn't pining for Jack, and she doesn't seem to have a problem with the arrangement, so how is she suffering? |
Because it is not shown on screen does not mean that she does not suffer in privates, Taylor is a person who most of the times suffers in private.
And at this point Taylor is not written to have any dialog, but that can change. |
MIsses M. when they actually show Taylor suffering, or if they insinuate she is doing it off stage, then I will agree with you. But, she isn't suffering that we can see. Why do we have to assume she is? |
At the moment Taylor is not in Jacks story.
The last we know is Taylor share custody with Nick and Brooke. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MYBeauty
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 207
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That's correct. Then why say she is suffering? For that matter if we can assume Taylor is suffering, we can also assume that Bridget is taking Jack to see her. Or we can assume that Taylor has Jack on certain nights of the week. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swaldo
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 780
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly MM -
And there is absolutely no reason why Jack shouldn't be with Taylor, she is his mother.
We know what Taylor went through to get custody of Jack and she proved she was a good mother. What has Nick done to prove he's a good father - he held mommy "try-outs", he pushed one woman away to try and get the egg donor in his life. He had Jack's aunt in his life as "mommy", now he has Jack's half-sister in his life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Misses M
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 1921
Location: Hunter/Taylor fan
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MYBeauty wrote: | | That's correct. Then why say she is suffering? For that matter if we can assume Taylor is suffering, we can also assume that Bridget is taking Jack to see her. Or we can assume that Taylor has Jack on certain nights of the week. |
The writer did not show us what transpired, so at this point it is speculation.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MYBeauty
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 207
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| swaldo wrote: | Exactly MM -
And there is absolutely no reason why Jack shouldn't be with Taylor, she is his mother.
We know what Taylor went through to get custody of Jack and she proved she was a good mother. What has Nick done to prove he's a good father - he held mommy "try-outs", he pushed one woman away to try and get the egg donor in his life. He had Jack's aunt in his life as "mommy", now he has Jack's half-sister in his life. |
Look. I understand the frustration. I mentioned in this thread that Taylor should have Jack living with her, but that is not what is happening. Taylor decided to share custody with Brooke and as far as we know, she is fine with the arrangement in place.
We don't see either Brooke or Taylor mention or be with Jack. We do know that Bridget and Nick have him and they both love him and want the best for him. That is what is being shown on screen. We don't have Taylor or Brooke having a problem with it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Misses M
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 1921
Location: Hunter/Taylor fan
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| swaldo wrote: | Exactly MM -
And there is absolutely no reason why Jack shouldn't be with Taylor, she is his mother.
We know what Taylor went through to get custody of Jack and she proved she was a good mother. What has Nick done to prove he's a good father - he held mommy "try-outs", he pushed one woman away to try and get the egg donor in his life. He had Jack's aunt in his life as "mommy", now he has Jack's half-sister in his life. |
You are right, it is Nick who caused Jack instability in his young life, and people say Jack needs stability, but to say Taylor should not get him in her care anymore, that would not be good, but it is good to grown up with her half sibling as a stepmom and a father who had mommy dry outs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MYBeauty
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 207
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Misses M wrote: | | swaldo wrote: | Exactly MM -
And there is absolutely no reason why Jack shouldn't be with Taylor, she is his mother.
We know what Taylor went through to get custody of Jack and she proved she was a good mother. What has Nick done to prove he's a good father - he held mommy "try-outs", he pushed one woman away to try and get the egg donor in his life. He had Jack's aunt in his life as "mommy", now he has Jack's half-sister in his life. |
You are right, it is Nick who caused Jack instability in his young life, and people say Jack needs stability, but to say Taylor should not get him in her care anymore, that would not be good, but it is good to grown up with her half sibling as a stepmom and a father who had mommy dry outs. |
Again, I will repeat that Jack should be living with Taylor, but he isn't and that isn't anyone else's fault but her own. She made the decision. And, even if you feel she did it under duress, she has had time to change her mind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MYBeauty
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 207
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let me add to Swaldo and MissesM:
I hope I didn't come across as confrontational with my posts. It wasn't meant in that vein. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Misses M
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 1921
Location: Hunter/Taylor fan
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MYBeauty wrote: | Let me add to Swaldo and MissesM:
I hope I didn't come across as confrontational with my posts. It wasn't meant in that vein. |
No, problemo  ((MYBeauty))
the problem is, that we are speaking as viewers here, not from the characters point.
the writing is to vague and that causes speculation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joanna
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 3010
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MYBeauty wrote: | | Misses M wrote: | | MYBeauty wrote: | | How is Taylor suffering?? She looks fine to me. She isn't pining for Jack, and she doesn't seem to have a problem with the arrangement, so how is she suffering? |
Because it is not shown on screen does not mean that she does not suffer in privates, Taylor is a person who most of the times suffers in private.
And at this point Taylor is not written to have any dialog, but that can change. |
MIsses M. when they actually show Taylor suffering, or if they insinuate she is doing it off stage, then I will agree with you. But, she isn't suffering that we can see. Why do we have to assume she is? |
Who says she has to be suffering?? If we are to assume that she has shared custody then she is in touch with her son. He is in her life, and at this point she still probably believes that giving him to Brooke was the best thing for him. And THAT needs to change, because being with someone like Brooke is not good for ANY child, even her own, not to emntion the one she never really wanted.
The writers have to show the TRUTH, and the only truth is that the woman that WANTS a child is the best thing for him.
Taylor might feel content with her life now. Her son is where she thinks he is happy. She moved on after the fiasco with Ridge, but that is not the point. The point is that we were presented with ABSURD, SICK and totally RIDICULOUS concept of a child rejecting a mother because of her DNA. That was insulting and that needs to be corrected. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MYBeauty
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 207
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Misses M wrote: | | MYBeauty wrote: | Let me add to Swaldo and MissesM:
I hope I didn't come across as confrontational with my posts. It wasn't meant in that vein. |
No, problemo ((MYBeauty))
the problem is, that we are speaking as viewers here, not from the characters point.
the writing is to vague and that causes speculation. |
((((MissesM))))) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
